_______________________________________________
- THE FRIDAY LETTER -
(emailed weekly,
from Gilder Publishing,
for friends and subscribers)
_______________________________________________
| http://www.gilder.com/ | Issue 371.0/February 6,
2009
SIGN-UP A FRIEND FOR FREE!
HEADLINES:
- The Week / The Innovator’s Prescription
- Friday Feature / Motorola Reassures
on Qualcomm & TI
- Friday Blogger Bonus / Twitter Time
- Readings /
The Week / The Innovator’s Prescription
Rick Merritt, EE Times (1/29/09): Health care will follow the model of the computer industry,
creating waves of disruption with increasingly de-centralized systems and
services. That's the prediction of Clayton Christensen who is spending time
lobbying lawmakers to help make it come true.
The Harvard
Business School professor's most recent book, "The Innovator's
Prescription” applies Christensen's widely discussed ideas to the health care
industry where he projects significant changes in medical electronics and
pharmaceuticals. But moving health care out of hospitals and clinics and into
the home will require policy changes in insurance reimbursement, a fact that is
increasingly taking him to Washington D.C.
Christensen spoke
of his work in health care and his views on the current recession in an
interview after a keynote at a supply chain summit sponsored by Microsoft.
View Christensen’s Talk (video):
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212903571
His talk at the Microsoft event reflected his views
that up-end conventional thinking about managing innovation in business.
"It's the principals of good management that we teach at Harvard that
cause innovation to be a crapshoot," he said, noting only 20 percent of
new products by established companies and a similar fraction of startup companies
ever find success.
Companies waste
time segmenting markets by product and customer types, generating
"one-size-fits-none products." Instead they should try to understand
"the real job a customer hires a product to do," he said.
"That job is
the fundamental unit of analysis, not the customer," he said. "The
average customer doesn't exist."
Christensen also
gave several examples of how companies fall into the trap of "going up the
ladder to invest in high-profit margin products and wind up liquidating their
business models."
PC makers such as
Dell have fallen prey to that pratfall from Taiwan ODMs such as AsusTek. In the
car industry, that's how Toyota overtook General Motors, he said, and the
problem continues.
"Today the
Koreans have taken the low-end of the car market, and now you have Cherry
coming from China that no one has to worry about ever," he quipped.
He also
reiterated his celebrated theme that companies get trapped into sustaining
existing innovations and miss out on new ones. That's because existing products
have their own set of resources, processes and financial models that people in
the company get locked into defending.
To overcome that
force, companies need to set up independent business units free to create their
own processes and models, he said. IBM successfully did that when minicomputers
threaten its mainframe business and again when PCs threatened its minis.
"Accountants
want these new groups to share resources with the old ones because they have no
way to quantify the value of focus," he said. "Creativity is rarely
in short supply, it's the processes that force new ideas to conform to current
practices," he added.
- RELATED READING -
Bracing For Disruption:
http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=LUPSKU3LBVAJOQSNDLRSKH0CJUNN2JVN;?articleID=197002716
|
The Gilder Telecosm Forum To
learn how to join this powerful network of talented, tech-savvy investors and
thinkers online daily to debate, discuss, and decode new and emerging
technologies and share valuable and actionable investment advice, visit www.Gildertech.com today. |
Friday Feature / Motorola Reassures on
Qualcomm & TI
Judy Weil, Seeking Alpha (2/04/09): Motorola is banking on Google's (GOOG) Android navigating
system for its Smartphone strategy. Analysts asked if that would change
Motorola's relationship with Texas Instruments. Motorola (MOT) on Texas
Instruments (TXN) and Qualcomm
(QCOM), from the company's Q408
conference call:
Our Smartphone road map
includes a variety of devices, many based on the Android operating system.
Q: I know Qualcomm (QCOM) has done a lot of work
with Android and so the chips are pretty well tuned and the software, it’s
tuned for Android. I wanted to get a sense if you thought from a funding
perspective you might back off on your work with Texas Instruments there?
A: Between 30% and 40% of our R&D investment is on Smartphone going
forward. We think that one of the reasons that we’ve liked Android is that we could
focus a lot of those dollars on differentiating, because we don’t have to
develop the platform ground-up.
Q: Is Texas Instruments, is
that going to be your lead horse or are you going to back off on that work and
move more towards QUALCOMM, do you think?
A: In the low end, we are
committed to Qualcomm solutions. In the high end, we have committed to TI and
we remain committed to that strategy.
Read the Full Conference Call
Transcript:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/118199-motorola-inc-q4-2008-earnings-call-transcript?page=-1
__________________________________________
Friday Blogger Bonus / Twitter Time
Renee Hopkins Callahan, Forbes.com
“Disrupter of the Month” (2/05/09): Distributing software for free
or making a Web application for free isn't an unusual business model. The basic
idea is to attract people, build an audience and then make money by selling
advertising. While print publications have long thrived this way, ad sales have
also been the basis for the success of Internet-based companies such as Google (GOOG),
MySpace and Facebook.
But San Francisco, Calif.-based Twitter, the micro-blogging service that
looks like a standalone version of Facebook's "status update"
feature, seems to fly in the face of these successful companies. Started in
2006, Twitter has managed to gather around 6 million users to its free service.
But unlike the others, Twitter hasn't developed any revenue streams or even a
business model. Its chief executive, Evan Williams, has been notoriously
against allowing advertising on his site.
Our opinion: Don't discount Twitter. The company could become a big
disruptive force.
Let's look at Twitter's options. One thing Twitter cannot do is maintain
its status quo. While it seems unlikely that another large company would build
a Twitter competitor, it's worth noting that Twitter can't rely on its
first-mover status. Google, Facebook and LinkedIn, for instance, were not first
in their respective businesses. Apple's (AAPL) iPod was not the first MP3 player. Today, these companies
all dominate their businesses, and the first movers are all but forgotten.
Another reason why Twitter has to move fast: It faces at least one
potential threat from a new company called Yammer, which allows employees in
any organization to start their own Yammer network, creating databases of
ideas, news, links, questions and other information for internal use. Yammer's
intention is to figure out what kinds of services it could offer companies that
they would be willing to pay for. If it succeeds, Yammer could be, potentially,
a Twitter killer.
So what can Twitter do? One possibility: It could be acquired by another
company. Potential suitors might include Google, Yahoo! (YHOO) or Facebook. However,
this seems unlikely. In November, Twitter's founders decided to forgo a $500
million acquisition offer by Facebook, concerned about the valuation of the
Facebook stock that was being offered and preferring to remain independent.
A second, more likely option…? Read
on:
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/05/twitter-google-apple-leadership-clayton-christensen_0205_business_model.html
__________________________________________
Readings /
Microsoft: We’re Not Making a Smartphone
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/02/05/microsoft-once-again-were-not-making-a-smartphone/?mod=rss_WSJBlog?mod=
Ten Ways to Use LinkedIn to Find a Job
http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2009/02/10-ways-to-use.html
Lenovo Refocuses on China
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123380896784051197.html
__________________________________________
ADVERTISING INFORMATION
The Friday Letter is mailed each week to 40,000-plus subscribers
and friends of Gilder Publishing, including industry leaders, financial
professionals and individual investors. For information about advertising,
contact Lauren Klopacs at lklopacs@forbes.com.
PLEASE NOTE: The appearance of an advertisement in the Friday Letter
does not indicate an endorsement for the product and/or service by George
Gilder, Gilder Publishing LLC, or the Friday Letter staff.
FEEDBACK AND PROBLEMS
For technical problems, or to send letters to the editor, please
e-mail info@gilder.com.
MAILING ADDRESS
Gilder Publishing, LLC
ATTN: Friday Letter
291A Main Street
Great Barrington, MA 01230
_______________________________________________
The Friday Letter is published weekly for subscribers and
friends of Gilder Publishing. If someone you know would enjoy it, please feel
free to forward a copy.
Gilder Publishing makes the Friday Letter available for free. To
help defray some of the costs of producing this information on a weekly basis,
we will from time to time be sending you offers from companies we think you'll
be interested in. These offers will not come more than once a week. If you do
not wish to receive this related information, please opt out of this process at
the link below and we will not share your name with companies outside of Gilder
Publishing.
To SUBSCRIBE please visit http://www.gilder.com/
To UNSUBSCRIBE please go to http://www.gilder.com/fridayletter/unsubscribe.php
Trouble subscribing or unsubscribing?
Email info@gilder.com
http://www.gilder.com/unsubscribe/specialproducts.php
To SUBSCRIBE please visit http://www.gilder.com/
To UNSUBSCRIBE please go to http://www.gilder.com/fridayletter/unsubscribe.php
Trouble subscribing or unsubscribing?
Email info@gilder.com
_______________________________________________
Copyright 2009 Gilder Publishing LLC