_______________________________________________

-  THE FRIDAY LETTER  -

(emailed weekly, from Gilder Publishing,
for friends and subscribers)

_______________________________________________


 | http://www.gilder.com/ | Issue 359.0/October 10, 2008

SIGN-UP A FRIEND FOR FREE!
 

 

HEADLINES:

-  The Week / Giant Leaps & Small Steps for Energy Technology
-  Friday Feature / George Gilder: Is Obama Coasting Too Soon?
-  Friday Blogger Bonus / Steve Forbes:
Fear Will Subside
-  Readings /

 

The Week / Giant Leaps and Small Steps for Energy Technology

Mark Mills, Forbes.com “Creative Disruption” (10/9/08): President Kennedy's 1961 speech launched the Apollo Program. Imagine if he had invoked the spirit of the Roaring '20s and the technology of the first radio broadcasts. That's the time span that separates today from the Apollo and, even longer, from the Manhattan projects that were embraced as archetypes for 21st century energy policy. While historically impressive, those programs fail as models to meet our energy needs.

 

One of the great physicists and teachers of the 20th century, Nobel Laureate Richard P. Feynman (a Manhattan Project veteran), said that, "Energy is a very subtle concept. ... It is very, very difficult to get right." The evidence that policy makers, never mind physicists, have had a hard timing getting it "right" is starkly obvious given our energy situation and history's lessons. Wind back the clock to see all the warnings.

 

Right after the Manhattan Project--following World War II when oil was front and center--the American Petroleum Institute, in its 1948 prototype for all subsequent energy reports, concluded:

"We are already depending more and more upon imports ... the probability [is for] long-continued international strain--or worse--and fiercer international competition for energy. ..."

 

Fast forward to October 1973 when Saudi Arabia banned U.S. exports, driving oil prices up 300%. Then to February 1979 when the Iranian revolution shot oil prices up another 260%. Now, roughly since 9/11, prices have blown past a 500% gain.

 

What's changed over the past half-century since all the above? Surprisingly little. There are no new energy sources; nothing equivalent to the first oil well drilled in Pennsylvania in 1859, or the 1949 discovery of the Saudi Ghawar oil field (world's largest). The newest addition to the phenomenology of energy production, the solar-electric cell, dates to 1954 at Bell Labs; the first fission for nuclear energy was 1942 at the University of Chicago; piston engines around 1900, steam engines in the 1700s; wind and water mills predate the 1200s. There is nothing new under the sun for producing energy.

 

But "new" has been happening in ever-emerging technologies and ways we find to use energy. Who would have thought that computers would lead to thousands of Wal-Mart (nyse: WMT)-sized data centers each consuming the power of a steel mill--collectively as much energy as global aviation? Which brings us to the central reality that has changed over the decades: The scale.

 

Benchmarking from the first modern energy crisis in 1973, when President Nixon launched Project Independence ("make the U.S. energy independent by 1980"): Global energy use has increased by an amount equal to adding another U.S. to the planet. The world now uses the energy equivalent of 2,500 barrels of oil every second (some 40% is oil). If those barrels were stacked up, the pile would grow taller at 5,000 miles per hour.

 

What's going on? Billions more people. Trillions more dollars. Developed nations are transforming from a post-industrial to a gross domestic product-accelerating, information-centric era. Developing nations are industrializing and leapfrogging into the information economy. As world GDP grows from $50 trillion to $80 trillion in 20 years, new supply equal to France's total energy consumption will be needed each year. This is the central challenge of our era….

 

Read On:
http://www.forbes.com/leadership/claytonchristensen/2008/10/09/walmart-exxon-energy_leadership_clayton_in_mm_1009claytonchristensen_inl.html


The Gilder Telecosm Forum

The next logical step in the evolution of the Gilder Technology Report (published by Gilder Publishing, LLC in association with Forbes Inc., 1996-2007), the Gilder Telecosm Forum is the web’s premier technology investment discussion forum.

 

To learn how to join this powerful network of talented, tech-savvy investors and thinkers online daily to debate, discuss, and decode new and emerging technologies and share valuable and actionable investment advice, visit www.Gildertech.com today.  


Friday Feature / Is Obama Coasting Too Soon?


Gilder Telecosm Forum Member (10/8/08): George how do you see the economic and political situation?

 

GEORGE GILDER, Gilder Telecosm Forum (10/8/08): I think McCain and Palin will win. I was in the Nixon campaign in 1968 and watched him try to coast to victory. If the election had been held a day or two later Humphrey would have won. Obama is already coasting even sooner than Nixon did. His idea that deregulation caused the crash is delusional. Hedge funds are actually outperforming banks and more regulated entities. Fanny and Freddy were pure political tools, regulated to the hilt to promote and mandate come-and-get-it EZchump mortgages, and the Democrats loved them both to death.

 

Read more posts by George Gilder and the Gilder Telecosm Forum members, logon with you subscriber password at www.Gildertech.com today.
__________________________________________

 

Friday Blogger Bonus / Fear Will Subside

Steve Forbes, Forbes.com “Fact and Comment” (10/9/08): Although you'd never know it from market volatility, the financial fever in the U.S. may be about to break. The Treasury, of course, must move with alacrity in removing those impaired mortgages and other exotic instruments off of bank balance sheets. Just as important, the Administration must deal decisively with the insanity of mark-to-market, or so-called fair value, accounting that has forced institutions under severe pressure from regulators and accountants to maniacally mark down to absurdly low levels the value of unmarketable securities and assets, thus destroying entities that have positive cash flows. Congress has made its intent clear: It wants mark-to-market scrapped or at least suspended for a good, long time. Sensible reform here would sharply alleviate the severity of the credit crisis. Foot- dragging on this would be criminal as well as destructive. And the SEC should get its act together on short-selling.

 

Taken together, these measures will allow banks and financial institutions to catch their breath and not fear that they will be gratuitously plunged into insolvency. A recuperation will then begin, which would be hastened if the Administration abandoned its weak dollar policy. In fact, a strong dollar commitment would stem the panic.

 

Meanwhile, Europe and Asia will find ways to stop the contagion there, just as we are haltingly, clumsily doing here. The great danger going forward will be the political reaction. Will we apply growth-stunting regulations in the name of "never again"? Will we raise taxes in part to punish the "rich," harming the capital creation so necessary for growth? The answers will determine whether we have a Reaganesque recovery or the drawn-out stagnation of the 1930s.

 

Why a panic unseen in almost everyone's lifetime? Never before in American economic history have we undergone such a confluence of irresponsible behavior, of measures taken and not taken that have been demonstrably destructive. Recent shenanigans over the bailout bill defied credibility. Our financial system was on the verge of a Great Depression wreck. Policymakers in those days could at least plead ignorance in their disastrous decisions.

The U.S. economy is in recession, and the slide is gaining momentum. Europe is also in a recession, and Asia's growth rates are slowing down markedly. Yet Congress couldn't resist playing brinksmanship partisan politics. The Administration deserves a severe knuckle-rapping as well. More important, President Bush--not to mention Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke--never convincingly explained to the American people why the legislation was a dire necessity, flawed as it was. Most Americans thought of it as a gratuitous handout to greedy Wall Street executives. Even so, House Republicans should have made sure the bill passed on Monday, Sept. 29. Occasionally members of the national legislature must act in the national interest even if--temporarily-- constituents don't realize the magnitude of the impending horror.

Put the bailout's $700 billion price tag in perspective: American households, until recently, had net assets of $56 trillion. A 2% decline in the value of those financial and hard assets overwhelms that $700 billion.

This whole crisis was absolutely unnecessary. The list of villains is long and ugly….

Read On:
http://www.forbes.com/opinions/forbes/2008/1027/021.html

__________________________________________

Readings /

New Chips Poised to Revolutionize Photography
http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/10/new-chips-poise.html

 

Silicon Valley Finds Isn’t Immune to Credit Crisis
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122359422742921079.html

 

An Easier Update to Holographic Storage
http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/21507/?a=f

 

Linux at 17: What Windows Promised to Be

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/09/linux_at_17/

 

World first for sending data using quantum cryptography
http://www.physorg.com/news142677178.html

 

Market Freefall: 10 Depressing Facts

http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/10/market-free-fal.html

__________________________________________
 

Friday Letter Editor: Mary Collins George / mcollins@gilder.com
 

ADVERTISING INFORMATION

The Friday Letter is mailed each week to more than 40,000-plus subscribers and friends of Gilder Publishing, including industry leaders, financial professionals and individual investors. For information about advertising, contact Lauren Klopacs at lklopacs@forbes.com.

PLEASE NOTE: The appearance of an advertisement in the Friday Letter does not indicate an endorsement for the product and/or service by George Gilder, Gilder Publishing LLC, or the Friday Letter staff.

 

FEEDBACK AND PROBLEMS

For technical problems, or to send letters to the editor, please e-mail info@gilder.com.

 

MAILING ADDRESS

Gilder Publishing, LLC

ATTN: Friday Letter

291A Main Street

Great Barrington, MA 01230

_______________________________________________

The Friday Letter is published weekly for subscribers and friends of Gilder Publishing. If someone you know would enjoy it, please feel free to forward a copy.

 

Gilder Publishing makes the Friday Letter available for free. To help defray some of the costs of producing this information on a weekly basis, we will from time to time be sending you offers from companies we think you'll be interested in. These offers will not come more than once a week. If you do not wish to receive this related information, please opt out of this process at the link below and we will not share your name with companies outside of Gilder Publishing.

 

To SUBSCRIBE please visit http://www.gilder.com/

To UNSUBSCRIBE please go to http://www.gilder.com/fridayletter/unsubscribe.php

 

Trouble subscribing or unsubscribing?

Email info@gilder.com

 

http://www.gilder.com/unsubscribe/specialproducts.php

 

To SUBSCRIBE please visit http://www.gilder.com/

To UNSUBSCRIBE please go to http://www.gilder.com/fridayletter/unsubscribe.php

 

Trouble subscribing or unsubscribing?

Email info@gilder.com

_______________________________________________

Copyright 2008 Gilder Publishing LLC