 |
 |
|

page 6 of 10
Goliath At Bay
But the @Home
people were perplexed. How could they use Windows NT, an alien system
on the Internet, unfamiliar to their employees or to the Internet service-provider
personnel who would work the @Home headends and other nodes? Microsoft
was behaving in the Internet environment as if the company were still
safe in the imperial realms of Windows desktops.
So @Home, which promises to be the most important force in the next phase
of Internet evolution, and Medin, the intellectual firebrand at the heart
of @Home, seem unlikely to embrace Microsofts offerings.
Milo's Dark Shadow Over Microsoft
As for TCI, its enthusiasm was dented a bit by the collapse of the MSN
project, in which Malone invested $125 million. But TCI has recouped its
loss. Jim Clark was persuaded to offer TCI a small share of the Netscape
IPO. After the initial public offering and the subsequent boom in Netscape
shares, TCIs holding was worth $125 million, leaving TCI quite comfortable
with its new allies in Mountain View.
A deeper look at Medins plans casts darker shadows in the path of
Microsoft. Asked about the notion of an Internet computer being free of
Windows and other Microsoft levies, Gates stops rocking on his chair and
gets to his feet. He turns and paces urgently back and forth across his
office. He gesticulates, summons the history of past challenges, refers
repeatedly to dumb terminals and other unappetizing machines, and hurls
forth rhetorical questions: Do you want to go onto the Internet
when you are doing word processing, do you want to go on the Internet
when you are using PowerPoint or Excel? In other words, do you want
to forgo all the wonderful new OLE interactions among Microsoft programs
and all the new Microsoft hot links and other forthcoming tools when you
go on the Net?
Under the pressure of Gatess energy and conviction and hypotheticals,
I answer, Of course not. But the real answer is, Sure,
if in exchange I can have a computer that outperforms a current Wintel
machine on the Net and contains linking capabilities comparable to OLE
for one-third the price.
Gates himself sketched out the answer in his famous Internet Tidal Wave
memo, issued in May to galvanize his company in the face of the new threat.
He pointed out that not only could he access far more information on the
Internet, he could also find, search and browse it more readily on the
Net than on a LAN or, for that matter, he might have pointed out, Gatess
own hard drive or CD-ROM.
The error of all the critics of the $500 teleputer is their assumption
that it will be inferior to current PCs. It will be, they claim, a PC
minus a fast CPU, short a high-resolution monitor, without a fast memory
or large drive.
This assumption misses the compounding impact of microcosm and telecosm.
The advance of chip technology, through Moores Law, together with
the advance of network bandwidth, will endow a machine not inferior but
hugely more powerful, than the most supercharged Pentium workstation on
a local-area network linked to the Internet at ISDN speeds.
The Law of the Microcosm ordains that one-chip systems will be better,
not worse, than intersecting boards strewn with devices linked by wires
and buses. As Wilf Corrigan, chief of LSI Logic, observes, From
calculators to cellular phones, every time a system has moved onto a single
chip, it has wreaked havoc with the existing industry.
IN PREPARING THE WAY for one-chip teleputers, Medin concedes that the
current Internet will not support broadband services. You link a
broadband modem to the existing Internet and what you get is an impedance
mismatcha bunch of fire hoses attached to a network of garden
hoses. In order to accommodate the fire hoses of @Home, Medin will have
to enlarge the bandwidth of the Net, from the humblest service provider
to the NAPs at the top of the network hierarchy, where the leading service
providers join to peer and exchange data.
Leasing capacity from the telephone companies, @Home will create a new
broadband network linking to the existing NAPs at MAE East in Tysons
Corner, Va., at the Sprint NAP in Pennsauken, N.J., and at MAE West in
Mountain View. This will expand the capacity of the so-called Internet
backbone (in fact, an ever-shifting array of virtual vertebrae), which
currently works with maximum pipes running at 45 megabits per second.
Over the next two years, Medin plans to upgrade his backbone to 622 megabits
a second.
Most important and revolutionary, though, are Medins plans for the
local loops and service providers of the Net. Contrary to the claims of
many critics that the Internet PC implies a return to the now-discredited
model of the mainframe and dumb terminals, @Home resolutely distributes
intelligence and memory through the network.
At the heart of the @Home system is ingenious hierarchical memory management
and caching to conceal the mazes of slow routers, sluggish switches and
narrowband wires that lurk treacherously among the higher reaches of the
Internet. Indeed, when Doerr finally got through to Medin and, with Will
Hearst, first proposed cable modems to him, he said they wouldnt
work. There would be impedance mismatches with the hardware
and software in the rest of the network.
This kind of blew the air out of their tires, says Medin.
But then I told them how the system could work.
You have to think of it as a distributed computer system. In such
systems, every processor cannot access memory at once. You build caches
and shared-memory protocols and you mirror and replicate a lot of the
data so that its always available locally. Thats what youre
going to have to do on the Internet.
In other words, the Internet is a computer on a planet. Like a computer
on a chip, its raw bandwidth cannot handle the necessary throughput. Thus
its communications depend on ingenious hierarchical memory management,
with registers, buffers, latches, caches and direct memory access controllers.
Studies of Internet use show that some 80% of the traffic is still local.
If a particular Web page is popular in a particular locality, you have
to have that page in the hard drive or even in RAM on a local server.
You have to use the multicast capabilities of cable to broadcast popular
information to all addresses. Above all, you have to make the system scalable.
You have to phase in bandwidth, moving fiber links and nodes deeper into
neighborhoods as demand rises. All this is perfectly possible technically,
Medin assured Doerr.
After I was through, they decided they had to hire me.
[
back
to top
]
[
page |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
]
|
 |